Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. " Governance, Negotiations, and Alliance Dynamics: Explaining the Evolution of Relational Practice," " Learning to Contract: Evidence from the Personal Computer Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. " Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives," " Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol.
" Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda,"
#BEHOLDER 2 GO TO THE PARTNERS HOME SERIES#
" Coping with Problems of Understanding in Interorganizational Relationships: Using Formalization as a Means to make Sense,"ĮRIM Report Series Research in ManagementĮRS-2006-034-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam. " Individual differences, psychological contract breach, and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study,"Īsia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol.
Chih-Ting Shih & Chih-Hsun Chuang, 2013. " Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure," " An Empirical Investigation of Interorganizational Opportunism and Contracting Mechanisms,"ģ8362, University Library of Munich, Germany. Lumineau, Fabrice & Quelin, Bertrand, 2012. I discuss implications in terms of the governance of interfirm exchange relationships. In particular, victims are more likely to assess a given unexpected behavior as opportunistic than transgressors, and their judgments do not relate to the underlying factors in the same way as the victims’ judgments. The second experiment, in which subjects were asked to take the perspective of the transgressor, demonstrates the influence of perspective. Results from the first experiment, where subjects were asked to take the perspective of a harmed party, show that opportunism judgments are influenced by the type of the behavior, type of the causal account provided for the behavior, perceived type of the exchange, and personality traits of the actor making the judgment. The present investigation explores the factors that shape exchange partners’ subjective opportunism judgments through two vignette-based laboratory experiments. The consequence of this assumption has been a disregard for factors other than the content of contracts that may influence whether exchange partners judge an unexpected behavior they face during exchange relationships as opportunistic or not. Yet, much of the empirical literature on opportunism has adopted a rather simplistic definition of opportunistic behaviors as behaviors that violate formal and/or relational contracts and assumed that instances of opportunism can be unequivocally defined by simply referring to the content of contracts. Contractualist work in business ethics as well as in economic organization theory views opportunistic behaviors as problematic since they create economic harm and are often considered to violate ethical norms.
0 kommentar(er)
